Anand Pediatric Associates Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923543460
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Irvine, CA, USA
Phone
9494247736
Rating
54
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Reported finances

Revenue
$400,000
Expenses
$377,223
Assets
$76,204
Liabilities
$50,924

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • sushil anand (ceo)

People named in this filing

  • sushil anand (ceo)
  • prem anand (cfo)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Medical Services for Underserved Children: The primary focus of our pediatric practice is to provide high-quality medical care to underserved children in our community. This includes routine check-ups, vaccinations, and treatment of various pediatric health issues. Preventative Health Education: We plan to conduct educational programs and workshops aimed at promoting preventive healthcare among children and their families. This may include seminars on nutrition, hygiene, and the importance of regular check-ups. Financial Assistance: To ensure that all children have access to healthcare, we intend to establish a financial assistance program. This program will provide support to families who are unable to afford medical services, including reduced or waived fees based on income levels. Partnerships with Schools and Community Organizations: We will collaborate with local schools and community organizations to reach children in need. This may involve on-site clinics and health fairs.

What it reported doing in 2025

Setup a pediatric practice to provide high quality care to underserved children in our community. This includes routine checkups, vaccinations and treatment of various pediatric health issues. Majority of the time was spent on getting various licenses and permits from the city of Irvine. City of Irvine asked us to apply for a zone change permit to our office. As part of this zone change application, the city asked us to perform a traffic study and various other studies. We had employed several consultants to perform all the required studies. We had attended multiple city council meetings. We have promised approval by 2026.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 30
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.2%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 56.5%; rating input score 56
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -71.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.2% of revenue deployed · 56.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $213K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.