Anambra Family Association of Memphis

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263518906
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Memphis, TN, USA
Phone
9018493168
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,630
Expenses
$5,021
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MRS IFY MADUBUOWN (PRESIDENT)
  • MRS OGE AZOGINI (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MRS IFY MADUBUOWN (PRESIDENT)
  • MRS OGE AZOGINI (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MRS OBY ONULIYI (FINANCIAL SECRETARY TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Anambra family association of memphis (afam) is a 501(c)(3) socio-cultural organization in the memphis metropolitan area, Tennessee, USA. It brings together everybody in the memphis area that is originally from anambra state in south-eastern nigeria with the intention of promoting our cultural values and integrating them with the memphis community. Afam also serves to build a better and more prosperous community in memphis metropolis and also in anambra state, nigeria.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 18
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 27.8%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.8%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -44.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -26.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 27.8% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: Filed program service accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.