Anaheim New Life Mission Church
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330568405
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Fullerton, CA, USA
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,145,012
- Expenses
- $1,123,213
- Assets
- $3,718,958
- Liabilities
- $3,018,456
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- YOUNG BAE PARK (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- YOUNG BAE PARK (PRESIDENT): $34,980 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
New life mission church is a community of reformed believers committed to: the worship of the triune god, foremost through a biblically-defined sunday service as the primary way to build up believers through preaching and the sacraments. Cultivating a community wherein believers can plant deep roots in our church family through biblical fellowship and the openness and warmth of gospel-centered relationships. Making outreach a vital part of our everyday experience by bearing witness to christ in local evangelism and deeds of mercy and by actively participating in global missions.
What it reported doing in 2014
The 1st exempt purpose accomplishment is to carrying out overall program service activities, all in an effort to achieve the organizational mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 5
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 70.2%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.31; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 70.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $789K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.