Anaheim Ducks Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113839845
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Corona Del Mar, CA, USA
Phone
9497604300
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,377,930
Expenses
$2,885,899
Assets
$2,369,833
Liabilities
$246,604

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL SCHULMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY ARCIERO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL SCHULMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • LINDSEY SPINDLE (SECRETARY)
  • AARON TEATS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To facilitate and support programs that produce positive change for children and families throughout southern California by providing educational opportunities, broadening access to the sport of hockey and addressing the health and wellness needs of our community.

What it reported doing in 2024

The anaheim ducks foundation provides grants and support to a variety of nonprofit organizations with missions that are committed to making a positive impact in the lives of families and children through education, youth sports and health and wellness programs.a bridge for kidsactive kids allianceamerican cancer society relay for lifeangels baseball fdtnarmed services ymca san diegoart & creativity for healingartreach san diegobest friends animal societyboys & girls club of vistabudo acceleratorcarlsbad youth lacrosse casa youth sheltercharitable ventures of orange countychoc foundationconstitutional rights fdtn of o.c.court appointed special advocate of o.c.cystic fibrosis foundationdelhi centerds actionelijah-alavi foundationemilio nares foundationfriends: the national assocgigi's playhousegirl scouts of orange countygolf fore life skillshome start inc.house of mexicoi5 freedom networkirvine public schools foundationjacobs & cushman san diego food bankjessie rees foundationjmh - anaheim foundation inclafd foundationlatino health accesslaura's houseoc asain & pacific islander community allianceoc prideorange county community housing corporange county family justice center fdtnorange county rescue missionorangewood foundationpalomar health foundationpasadena humane societyplaymakerspriceless petsproject3rrad camprady children's hospital foundationreaching youth through music opportunitiesred sneakers for oakleyronald mcdonald house charities of san diegosan diego blood banksan diego ducks sled hockeysan diego gulls special hockeysan diego history centersan diego police foundation (ssp)san diego pridesan diego regional fire & emergency services foundationsd chinese historical museumsouth county outreachspecial olympics southern californiaspeech & language development centerspirit youth sportsstandup for kidsstudent runners of orange countysusan g. Komen san diego team rubiconthe h4h foundationthe miracle league of san diegothe wooden floortiger woods foundationtriumph togetheruc san diego foundationunited cerebral palsy assoc of o.c.united heroes leagueunited states veterans initiativeveteran tickets fdtnwarrior for life fundwe explore earthwise sdwomen's museum of californiawords aliveworld cental kitchen young mens christian assoc of o.c.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 59% for direct work, and 41% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: $403.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 93.4%; rating input score 93; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 48 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 48 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.