Anaheim Discovery Christian School
Legal name: Anaheim Discovery Christian Jrsr High Schools
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330172675
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2021
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- Anaheim, CA, United States
- Phone
- (714) 535-2535
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $754,501
- Expenses
- $1,120,898
- Assets
- $335,180
- Liabilities
- $27,793
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WUTTICHAI V CHAYASIRSOBHON (DIRECTOR, CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- WUTTICHAI V CHAYASIRSOBHON (DIRECTOR, CEO): $75,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Anaheim Discovery Christian School exists to provide spiritual and academic development for students and the school community, seeking to develop each child’s God-given gifts so students commit their lives to Christ and grow in a disciplined academic environment. 1. We believe that Anaheim Discovery Christian School was established by the Holy Spirit and exists to provide Spiritual and academic development for students, staff, parents, guardians and the school community. The Anaheim Discovery Christian School believes that each student was created by God with unique, individual gifts to ultimately be developed and used for God’s ordained purpose in life. Our faculty’s primary purpose is to be an example of Christ like behavior so that each child will commit his or her life to Him. 2. Next, our faculty attempts to promote a disciplined academic environment wherein each student is...
What it reported doing in 2021
Provide general education for junior and senior high school students
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 55
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -48.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.