Anacostia Watershed Society Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521666511
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bladensburg, MD, USA
Phone
3016996204
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,620,455
Expenses
$2,820,609
Assets
$2,191,047
Liabilities
$409,481

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTOPHER E WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT/CE)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTOPHER E WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT/CE): $181,567 total reported compensation
  • BEKAH R HOLLOWAY (DIR OF DEVEL): $135,610 total reported compensation
  • ERIN B CASTELLI (SENIOR V.P/C): $94,550 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Aws's mission is to protect and restore the anacostia river by bringing partners and communities together to achieve a clean and safe anacostia river for the benefit of all living in its watershed and for future generations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Restoration: aws restoration program celebrated key milestones for 2024. Key metrics include: - 980 native plants, shrubs and trees planted - 1,757 freshwater mussels released into the anacostia river - 1.42 acres of land cleared from invasive plant species - 35 tons of trash removed from the watershed - 2,483 volunteers joined aws staff in our field conservation and restoration efforts programmatic highlights include: earth day 2024 cleanup aws' signature earth day cleanup attracted 1,506 volunteers to 38 cleanup sites across the watershed, removing a total of 5948 lbs of trash from the watershed. Wild rice restoration after over two decades of dedicated effort, aws has successfully re- established wild rice in the wetlands of the anacostia river. This keystone species was virtually eliminated from the watershed by pollution and habitat destruction. Through careful harvest and planting of wild rice seeds by our students and volunteers, and predator control to allow the plants to grow, we reached 26 acres of self-sustaining wild rice. State of the river report card aws continued our critical role of monitoring water quality for the anacostia river through the 2024 state of the river report, receiving its highest grade to date. This report is a key accountability and transparency mechanism to ensure the watershed community continues to be aware of the status of water quality of the anacostia river. Thanks to significant efforts by the federal and district governments, the toxics remediation score has been steadily improving. While there is great progress in controlling threats to water quality, the anacostia watershed continues to suffer from the historical loss of wetlands and forests that once protected our rivers and streams from excessive run-off, sediment, and pollution. Climate change will heighten these challenges, and indeed threatens to roll back the gains we've made over the last 30 years.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.1%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 70.6%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.1% of revenue deployed · 70.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $182K · 13 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $387K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.