Amy Marshall Dance Company
Legal name: Amy Marshall Dance Company Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113585691
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- East Elmhurst, NY, USA
- Phone
- 917-647-9477
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,200
- Expenses
- $15,587
- Assets
- $38,340
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chad Levy (President)
- Linda Hodes (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Chad Levy (President)
- Linda Hodes (Vice President)
- Amy Marshall (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Amy Marshall Dance Company (AMDC) delivers outstanding, energetic performances, presenting work that ranges from traditionally classic and modern to edgy athletic dance. Seen around the globe, AMDC is known for programs that engage and communicate with audiences of all ages and with varying levels of understanding in dance.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Amy Marshall Dance Company delivers a multiple week school residency program designed to give students an understanding of modern dance and its relevance to present day issues. The residency consists of multiple technique classes, lecture and demonstrations, and performances. These residencies have served to enhance the cultural template of a young student's life.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.7%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 19.4%; rating input score 19
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -52.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.46; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -16.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 7 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 29.7% of revenue deployed · 19.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.