Amy Bell Charities Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862444500
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Midland, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4325537096
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,924,803
- Expenses
- $820,536
- Assets
- $5,462,040
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LARRY BELL (PRESIDENT)
- ELLEN BELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LARRY BELL (PRESIDENT)
- ELLEN BELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KARA BELL (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide supplemental funding to experienced, well-established, educational and health care groups and agencies in africa and other developing regions in support of children in need, anywhere in the world.
What it reported doing in 2025
Amy bell charities supports children in multiple locations in africa with school supplies, teacher support, uniforms, and food supplements. We support ten different schools in various places in africa. That includes three in south africa, one in namibia, five in zambia and we have added an additional school in uganda. Most of the schools vary in size from 40 students to 400 students. In total, we estimate we support daily feeding programs in five of the schools that have approximately 600 students. We provide one meal per day for each of the children on school days (approximately 200 school days per year) which totals serving over 120,000 meals per year. In some cases, we also supplement their food with additional food items for them to take home on weekends and during school holidays. We help with funding of critical school supplies, and we made a special grant to build and furnish a computer center for the middle school and high school students. In 2024, we also supported a feeding program in south africa that serves approximately 300 meals per week. These food items are distributed each week in squatter camps, homeless shelters for children and small day care centers that total over 20,000 meals per year. This agency also serves an additional 10,000 meals per year to children in small day care centers.we created a washable sanitary pad distribution program to enable young women to be full participants in their education and other activities by providing critically needed supplies for their menstrual cycle. We distributed pad kits to over 1,000 young women in 2024. We have funded programs in zambia around empowerment to educate and train village leaders and families to work toward reducing child marriage and child abuse in their communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.7%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $301.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.7%; rating input score 99; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.4%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.66; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 45% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.7% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $772K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.