AMVETS Post 21

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814834762
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Villas, NJ, USA
Phone
6095543158
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,954
Expenses
$39,920
Assets
$9,067
Liabilities
$2,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • William Archer (Commander)
  • James Premaza (1st Vice Commander)
  • Ralph Steblein (2nd Vice Commander)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Primary Purpose of this organization is to help our fellow Veterans, with Assistance in finding the help needed or providing care packages. We are very new, 3 yrs old, so in building stages. We will also be helping the children in our community to learn about Americanism, through various school events through next year. We now have a bus to help transport Veterans to Appointments and food banks. This year plan to help students with musical instruments repairs.

What it reported doing in 2019

We are growing and now have over 100 members at this point, we haven't had much opportunity to do many Events. We volunteered to help with the VA Medical Outreach program in Cape May County. We've given out some small donations to area charities for Veterans. We've adopted 8 over 90 yr old Veterans in a home. Visit them and include them in our meetings. We participate in all Veteran related Holiday events. Also, participated in a Food Drive in association with ShopRite Markets in Marmora and Rio Grande.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.1%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 159.1% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 159.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.