Amun Ministries International Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825020956
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Rathdrum, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2086871397
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,200
- Expenses
- $14,986
- Assets
- $66,873
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Keith Hein (Vice President of the Board)
People named in this filing
- Amber Inman (Director)
- Keith Hein (Vice President of the Board)
- Olivia Lunkuse (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Charitable organization providing skills training, business assistance, scholarships and Biblical teaching to the underprivileged in the Teso region of Uganda.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Women's Program continued to provide work opportunities to underprivileged individuals from the Teso region of Uganda, although we were a small group in 2025. We made leather goods, jewelry and quilts to sell in Ugandan shops as well as the States. There was a severe leather shortage in the program due to long tannery delays and poor quality leather, and as a result there were reduced work opportunities. We are hoping the leather issues will be resolved soon. Several students from Soroti town are participating in a reading program where they read 15 books a year to earn a scholarship. We also continue to help occasionally with other needs outside of the program such as assisting a widow who is a graduate with money to construct a small house or helping a single mother with a small scale business or medical needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.3%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 66.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.46; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -36.6% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 58.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.