Amsterdam Cares
Legal name: Amsterdam Nursing Home Corporation (1992)
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133834710
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2125753322
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $85,522,649
- Expenses
- $69,672,360
- Assets
- $88,598,895
- Liabilities
- $42,662,104
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES DAVIS (PRESIDENT / CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES DAVIS (PRESIDENT / CEO): $848,404 total reported compensation
- MOSHE BLACKSTEIN (ADMINISTRATOR): $648,615 total reported compensation
- PAMELA LANDMAN (SENIOR VP / GENERAL COUNSEL): $381,301 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Amsterdam nursing home corp. (1992) ("amsterdam") is a 409 bed skilled nursing facility (snf) and a 40 registrant adult day health care (adhc) providing long and short term residential care, aswell as day care, to persons living in the community. Amsterdam's mission is to provide the highest standard of health care to its residents, patients and day health care registrants. Amsterdam is proud to offer individualized care in a setting that supports the quality of life, dignity and autonomy of each person whom it serves.
What it reported doing in 2024
Amsterdam nursing home provides room and board and medical care for the elderly. Amsterdam has a capacity of 409 skilled nursing facility beds along with an adult day health care program with a capacity of 40 registrants. In 2024, amsterdam had 1,604 admissions and provided 145,651 days of patient care. Amsterdam had an occupancy rate of 97.3 percent in the nursing facility.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.6%; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.5%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 84.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $848K · 22 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10.2M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.