Ampla Health
Legal name: Ampla Health Marysville Qalicb
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921716997
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Yuba City, CA, United States
- Phone
- (530) 674-4261
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $379,996
- Expenses
- $239,444
- Assets
- $10,549,089
- Liabilities
- $9,334,790
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Benjamin Flores (Director): $634,558 total reported compensation
- Kathy Walker (Treasurer): $334,972 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of our communities by providing accessible, high-quality primary health care, appropriate to the cultures and languages of all. Colusa Regional Medical Center operates a county-wide health system consisting of a 48 bed acute care hospital and skilled nursing facility, a Home Health Agency, and rural health clinics located in the communities of Arbuckle, Colusa, Stonyford and Williams. CRMC is licensed by the State of California and has earned full accreditation from The Joint Commission, the nation’s “gold standard” in assessing hospital safety and quality of care. As a nonprofit health system, CRMC’s success is derived from the continued support of the people in the communities we serve; a consistent and continued belief in our mission; and, a never-ending focus on each patient’s needs. Contact: Dale Kirby, Chief Ex.
What it reported doing in 2024
To perform the charitable function of and carry out the charitable purposes of Ampla Health.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 56
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 44.06; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 96.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -43.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 63% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $239K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $635K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.