Amor Wellness Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852125597
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fresno, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5594408330
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $389,449
- Expenses
- $482,882
- Assets
- $498,041
- Liabilities
- $8,038,755
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DAVENA WITCHER (TREASURER): $159,077 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The amor wellness center is a rural hub of medical, mental health, social, youth, and educational services designed to address the extreme poverty entrenched in California's central valley.
What it reported doing in 2024
For years, agencies have invested their resources to fight this poverty with limited success. The breadth and depth of the needs in rural communities, combined with the lack of adequate space and high overhead, has limited the impact of what any one community benefit, county or state agency can achieve on its own.through a public, private and non-profit collaboration, the amor wellness center provides an unprecedented group of essential services including medical, behavioral health, dental, social, youth and education directly in mendota, a rural community of 12,000 desperately in need of this comprehensive support.the children and families living in California's rural central valley deserve the opportunity to establish themselves as contributing members of our economy with a clear path out of the poverty that has plagued them for generations. The amor wellness center is building that path.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 60
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -24%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 16.14; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -79% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $478K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $159K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.