Amnesty International USA
Legal name: Amnesty International of the USA Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 520851555
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2128078400
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Human Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,167,328
- Expenses
- $62,793,256
- Assets
- $57,939,297
- Liabilities
- $21,821,922
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL O'BRIEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL O'BRIEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $386,026 total reported compensation
- MARCY BOURNE (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $333,122 total reported compensation
- JEAN-CLAUDE TOUSSAINT (CHIEF FIN & ADMIN OFFICER): $299,584 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Amnesty International USA is a human rights organization that works to protect individuals at risk, end gun violence, support refugees and asylum-seekers, and campaign for the freedom of wrongfully detained activists worldwide.
What it reported doing in 2024
The strategy and impact department drives content, substance and strategy for aiusa's human rights impact. The department conducts domestic and leverages international research as a foundation for long-term strategic advocacy on the united states (and other) government and u.s. Corporations, leveraging their influence and holding them accountable on a range of pressing human rights issues domestically and internationally. The department develops targeted bursts of strategic campaigning to drive impact when a strong human rights opportunity or crisis emerges; all supported by a marketing and public-facing communications team that serves aiusa and the broader amnesty movement. The department is comprised of the following units 1) programs, (continued on schedule o).strategy and impact department (continued):2) government relations and advocacy, 3) campaigns and crisis response, 4) silicon valley initiative, 5) research, and 6) marketing and communication. 1. The programs unit consists of issue experts who manage ongoing bodies of work on human rights issues and who create and implement strategies to win human rights victories and make long-term human rights impact in particular thematic areas. 2) the campaigns and crisis response unit manages cross-functional efforts to campaign on and achieve timebound and intensified efforts to win human rights victories and help stop urgent human rights abuses. 3) the government relations and advocacy unit educates u.s. Government officials on human rights situations around the world, and advocates for u.s. Government policies and practices to help stop human rights violations by countries and other actors, in addition to ensuring the u.s. Is not violating human rights abroad. 4) the silicon valley initiative is a joint endeavor between amnesty international's international secretariat and aiusa to engage with the technology sector for the advancement of human rights.5) the research unit conducts original human rights research (reports, policy briefings, case files, amicus briefs, protest monitoring, and international advocacy) on domestic human rights issues in the united states. 6) the marketing and communications unit is responsible for leading aiusa's media/press work and engaging with us-based media, public-facing digital communications including aiusa's social media channels and website, multimedia production, and managing relationships with those in the entertainment and arts industry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 70.7%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 91.2%; rating input score 91; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 70.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $44.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $386K · 35 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $13.8M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.