Amistad Movement Power
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881114074
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2672255884
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $180,340
- Expenses
- $189,882
- Assets
- $44,868
- Liabilities
- $6,298
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- KEMPIS SONGSTER (BOARD MEMBER)
- LORRAINE HAW (SECRETARY/TR)
- STEPH DRAIN (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organizes and educates individuals impacted by mass incarceration to build progressive power.
What it reported doing in 2024
Base power meetings: amp co-hosted two meetings, held prior to the primary and general elections, targeted towards our formerly incarcerated and family member base to hear from candidates running for attorney general, state representative and state senate, as well as progressive elected officials. Members had the opportunity to engage with candidates and elected officials about their record and positions on mass incarceration and second chances. Additionally, we co-hosted a post-election debrief mass meeting to discuss how the election results impacted the anti-mass incarceration movement and to encourage our base to continue to be involved in state and local advocacy. Volunteer canvassing program: amp helped to coordinate a base of volunteers who are people who are directly impacted or deeply care about mass incarceration in Pennsylvania. These volunteers participated in canvassing in the west philadelphia and germantown neighborhoods of philadelphia on the weekends leading up to the spring primary election, sharing information with voters about the elections while also identifying others who also care about mass incarceration and might want to get more involved with our work. Paid canvassing program: amp launched a paid canvassing program ahead of the november general election to identify and engage neighbors in primarily west philadelphia and germantown who care about non-carceral community safety, and encourage them to turn out to vote. Canvass leaders knocked on approximately 10,000 doors from september through election day. We also trained election defenders to bring care and joy to several polling locations throughout west philadelphia and additional canvassers to get out the vote on election day. Community safety townhalls and events: leading up to the november general election, amp hosted multiple virtual and in person townhalls to provide political education and engage neighbors around alternative public safety solutions and the importance of voting. Participants heard from experts, elected officials and community leaders, watched pertinent media, had thoughtful brainstorms and discussions, and were able to come away with knowledge and tools to have deep conversations with friends and neighbors. Additionally, we hosted a rally and discussion circle in memory of a community member killed by police in 2020, as well as a community cookout to give away resources and information for voters. Movement celebrations: we co-hosted two social events, "decarcerate and chill," a summertime outdoor festival and "decarcerate and be merry," a holiday party. The purpose of these events was to bring our hardworking movement family together for a time of joy, celebration and community building. We shared with the audiences at both events about what the movement had accomplished and base member attendees were able to interact with public officials and community leaders in attendance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 77.9%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 54.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -40.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 77.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $148K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.