Amigos De Si a La Vida

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911307557
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
5413444463
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Parent Agencies

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,747
Expenses
$19,422
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rick Allstetter (President)

People named in this filing

  • Victor Odlivak (Treasurer)
  • Chris Pforr (Webmaster)
  • Dana and Nancy Quitslund (board members)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support health & human services in Central America

What it reported doing in 2021

Support for educational and health programs serving street kids (Associacion Si a La Vida) We provided a major portion of the funding to run centers to help the youth in both Managua and on Ometepe Island. These are both drop in day programs. A total of 17,615.23 dollars was given to support these two centers. 250 Dollars was given to a Women's Center for health, WEN (Women's Empowerment Network) in Nicaragua.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.3%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,011.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -37.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.3% of revenue deployed · 5.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $983 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.