Amery Lions Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391392268
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Amery, WI, USA
Phone
6126708112
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,919
Expenses
$43,542
Assets
$39,281

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHARON MARKS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID WALKER (PAST PRESIDE)
  • ROGER VAN SOMEREN (1ST VICE PRE)
  • ALEX MANSFIELD (2ND VICE PRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To empower volunteers to serve our community, meet humanitarian needs, encourage peace and promote international understanding through lions clubs.

What it reported doing in 2025

500 leader dogs for the blind for training dogs, 2,000 amery food pantry food for underprivileged amery families. 500 lions eye bank of Wisconsin for research of eye disease. 500 operation x-mas polk county toys for tots. 750 amery lions club child first program provided cold weather clothes for amery area youths. 500 interfaith caregivers provided amery area elderly home maintenance and medical transport assistance. 6,531 salvation army for student backpack program. 1,000 kinship of polk county for mentoring assistance. 500 community referral agency inc providing assistance to victims of domestic violence. 500 quarter moon acres horse riding therapy. 500 amery kops and kids. 250 restoring hope transplant house. 250 childhood cancer. Cample needle point 500. Miscellaneous 1,130.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 75% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 89% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.