Americaview
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770602801
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Logan, UT, USA
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,569,239
- Expenses
- $1,524,693
- Assets
- $491,853
- Liabilities
- $394,392
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER MCGINTY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER MCGINTY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $5,093 total reported compensation
- REBECCA DODGE (TREASURER): $1,000 total reported compensation
- RODNEY BRENT YANTIS (DIRECTOR): $500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Americaview advances earth observation education through remote-sensing science, applied research, workforce development, technology transfer, and community outreach.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule oamericaview (www.americaview.org) is a nationwide network that focuses on satellite remote sensing data and technologies in support of applied research, k-18 education, workforce development, and technology transfer. Americaview's vision is to empower and advance earth observation science education in every participating state, such that the organization continues to expand its influence through local, and state-level consortia and members. In the current tax year, americaview awarded sub-award funding to 40-member universities. Each state member has established in-state consortia, totaling more than 300 universities, non-profit organizations, and state and local government agencies across the united states. Americaview state members have leveraged existing education and outreach programs to develop new programs for k-18 students including introductory science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics (stem) education through advanced remote sensing and geospatial research and technology education. Members have expanded the use and understanding of remote sensing data and technology at the collegiate level and facilitated long-term workforce development.americaview uses multiple methods conducting national outreach efforts to highlight the beneficial uses of using remotely sensed data in a wide range of civilian applications including agricultural production, disaster response, natural resource management, and education. As part of its founding mission, americaview, in cooperation with public data providers, continues to increase access to public remote sensing imagery by making data available in standard ready-to-use formats to public agencies, educational institutions, commercial entities, and the public.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.7%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 88.2%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $46.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.8; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.7% of revenue deployed · 88.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5K · 10 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $106K reported
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 42 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 39 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.