Americans Helping Americans Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541594577
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7033179412
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,415,740
- Expenses
- $3,181,382
- Assets
- $1,362,539
- Liabilities
- $34,334
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRYAN L KRIZEK (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- PAUL KRIZEK ESQ (VICE PRESIDENT/GENERAL COUNSEL)
- CAMERON KRIZEK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BRYAN L KRIZEK (PRESIDENT/CEO): $464,687 total reported compensation
- PAUL KRIZEK ESQ (VICE PRESIDENT/GENERAL COUNSEL): $324,588 total reported compensation
- BIEU DO (CFO): $171,489 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Americans helping americans ("aha") provides basic necessities like food clothing, shelter, and support services. Aha is dedicated to helping poverty-stricken families, children, and elderly/disabled adults to meet their emergency needs and strengthen community relationship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Basic needs: holiday food: families in extreme poverty will often forgo planned saving just to have a traditional thanksgiving or holiday dinner. Parents, who want the best for their children, will spend more than they can afford to give their family some semblance of normalcy. It's a phenomenon aha and our field partners see every holiday season which is why more evictions happen around those times as families no longer have any savings to pay bills. Aha awarded $27,700 for holiday food, allowing 3,358 individuals to have a holiday meal. Thanksgiving and other holiday gatherings are hosted by field partners with volunteers to assist in inviting and serving the whole community.(see schedule o for continuation)approximately $7,400 in cash grants were awarded to field partners to provide basic support to 3,247 individuals which included hygiene and sanitation items, feminine and baby care, and purchasing any type of health item needed that often gets overlooked when living in extreme poverty.summer camps and feeding program: in fiscal year 2025, aha continued to assist the children even after they exited the school system for the summer by sponsoring summer feeding programs and summer camps. At aha sponsored summer camps, children were able to continue education, prevent summer brain drain, make new friends, and learn new valuable life skills. Parents were able to continue working to provide for the family while their child was taken care of. Aha makes summer camp, which usually would be expensive, accessible through $22,000 total grants to partners allowing 273 campers to attend.utilities: one in six appalachian residents live below the poverty line. People in 56 out of 420 counties within appalachia have a median income of $36,000. This haunting fact makes paying mortgage, rent, and utilities a daunting task for these americans. Even if tenants pay rent, landlords will evict tenants who have their utilities cut off fearing that pipes on their properties could freeze and burst in unheated apartments. Landlords also fear that if a tenant can't pay their electric bill that month, they may not be able to pay their rent the next. Parents could temporarily lose custody of their children as state human services agencies will not allow children to remain in a home without utilities. Electricity is required for oxygen concentrators, dialysis machines, feeding equipment and treatment of many other chronic illnesses. Without utilities, poor families will sink deeper into poverty. Americans helping americans supplied $8,600 in grant funding to help 3,563 residents within appalachia stay ahead of their bills. Aha donated 3,000 dental kits to help children continue proper oral care equipped with toothbrushes, toothpaste, floss, a timer, and two-week brushing calendar. 2,520 kids coats, 2,492 adults coats, and 5,700 blankets were distributed so that residents will stay warm. 306 shoes were given to children, many of whom received their 1st ever new shoe. Finally, 18,648 food boxes were delivered last year with each box weighing 20bs and ensuring a family of four food for a week.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $34.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.4% of revenue deployed · 95.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $465K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 41 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 41 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.