Americans for Securing All Packages

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813109818
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2025520221
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Safety Education

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,849
Expenses
$59,167
Assets
$1,038

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Anna Bell Gall (President)

People named in this filing

  • Anna Bell Gall (President)
  • Abigail Gardener (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Americans for securing all packages asap is a coalition of families, health care advocates, security experts, businesses and non-profits who believe it is time to close a dangerous security gap in shipments from foreign countries that leaves our nation vulnerable to foreign attacks and illegal and toxic drugs.

What it reported doing in 2020

Americans for securing all packages asap is a coalition of families, healthcare advocates, security experts, businesses and non-profits formed to close a dangerous security gap in shipments from foreign countries that leaves our nation vulnerable to foreign attacks and illegal and toxic drugs. The coalition has grown to two dozen members and has generated close to 100 news mentions across the country in the past year as we've worked to raise public awareness of this public health and security threat.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 67.6%; rating input score 68

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.6% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -39% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68% of revenue deployed · 67.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.