Americans Caring Teaching Sharing Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223882421
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Norwich, VT, USA
Phone
6035909288
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,860
Expenses
$94,140
Assets
$420,149
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Linda Kennedy (President)
  • Suzanne Burgos (Vice President and Medical & Public Health)

People named in this filing

  • Linda Kennedy (President)
  • Helen Whyte (Secretary)
  • Suzanne Burgos (Vice President and Medical & Public Health)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide medical, educational, agricultural and water systems support to rural Honduran villages in the Locomapa, Yoro region.

What it reported doing in 2025

Support English as a second language, computer education, children's library services by funding a community center in El Rosario, Locomapa region, Yoro, Honduras, used and directed by local residents of the area. Support operations (support personnel, school lunches, textbooks, and transportation), and facilities infrastructure support (latrines, furniture, classrooms) of a high school (Colegio) serving approximately 90 students from El Rosario, Locomapa region, Honduras and surrounding villages. It is governed by a local education committee with support from ACTS Honduras. Teachers are provided and funded by the Honduran government.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.8%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.46; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.