Americans Back in Charge Committee
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742638219
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Conifer, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038166222
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Nerve, Muscle and Bone Diseases
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $225
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHARI D WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHARI D WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
- PAUL W OGLE (DIRECTOR)
- BRUCE BENSON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The american public desires a transformation in the way the federal government works, by returning it to the people. The committee's primary exempt purpose is to advocate legislative and constitutional changes that will accomplish this goal. Through a national grassroots network of individual leaders, organizations and activists committed to structural change, the committee actively supports term limits for politicians, a balanced budget amendment to the constitution to eliminate the deficit, a flat tax and a line item veto to permit the president to cut wasteful spending.
What it reported doing in 2017
The committee's principal exempt purpose achievement was to increase the knowledge of the american public about legislative issues that will transform the way the federal government works, through increasing the education of and networking amoung the american public to demonstrate support for the committee's legislative agenda and by some dissemination of brochures and pamphlets. The committee focused its efforts on persuading the public to advocate that federal, state and local legislators adopt legislation that will impose term limitations on career politicians. The organization also granted funds to coloradoans for workers rights, a non-profit organization leading a movement to end involuntary political contributions from citizens.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.