AMERICAN YOUTH FOOTBALL INC Development of Youth Athletic Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271750295
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Norfolk, VA, USA
Phone
7575279403
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,049
Expenses
$7,051
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Pamela Murdock (President)
  • Lynette Johnson (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Pamela Murdock (President)
  • Lynette Johnson (Vice President)
  • Litisha Butler (Secretary Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Development of Youth Athletic Association DOYAA is a 501c3 Nonprofit Organization that serves youth of all ages in the community The mission of Development of Youth Athletic Associaiton is to provide youth within the community an athletic program that is dedicated and commited to a structured environment based on strong fundamental values through sportsmanship and community involvement along with mentorship program. DOYAA will encourage and support each youth to strive and attain academic excellence for a brighter future that will allow them to become successful and productive citizen in the community.

What it reported doing in 2022

Since COVID, Development of Youth Athletic Association has operated on a limited budge during the 2021 program year. DOYAA will continue its one-on-one youth mentorship program on a need basis. We continue to offer our weight training guidance program to youth and families who are able to pay for their own gym monthly membership. DOYAA also provide tools on how to improve their eating habits through our nutritional program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -74.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -34.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.