American Surgical Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953126287
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Beverly, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9789278330
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,415,803
- Expenses
- $994,707
- Assets
- $6,599,128
- Liabilities
- $5,710
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RONALD J WEIGEL MD PHD (PRESIDENT/ PRES-ELECT)
- JEFFREY A DREBIN MD PHD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- EDWARD E CORNWELL III MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL J ZINNER MD (VICE PRESIDENT (APRIL 2024))
- STEVEN C STAIN MD (COUNCILOR/PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RONALD J WEIGEL MD PHD (PRESIDENT/ PRES-ELECT)
- JEFFREY A DREBIN MD PHD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- EDWARD E CORNWELL III MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To be a premier academic surgical society that strives for excellence and leadership in science, education, and patient care while promoting diversity, integrity, and innovation; and to provide a national forum for presenting the developing state of the art and science of general and (sub)specialty surgery and the elevation of the standards of the medical/surgical profession.
What it reported doing in 2024
Grants - to encourage the study of and to maintain the highest possible standards for surgical education, practice, and research; and to aid in the development of future academic surgical leaders and of health policy managers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.7%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.63; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60% of revenue deployed · 71.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $710K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $285K reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.