American Subcontractors Association of Arizona Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742353462
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6022748979
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$489,461
Expenses
$460,977
Assets
$544,991
Liabilities
$385,062

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSH UMAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THRU 05/2025)
  • BRANDI MONROY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AS OF 06/2025)
  • DICK ROBERTS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • NATE FIRNSTAHL (PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT HUGHES (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSH UMAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THRU 05/2025): $102,000 total reported compensation
  • BRANDI MONROY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AS OF 06/2025): $62,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The american subcontractors association of Arizona is a non-profit organization that serves as a national membership trade association. It provides opportunities for business development, education, networking, and the latest construction trends.

What it reported doing in 2024

Asa of Arizona, inc., is an important source of professional growth for construction specialty contractors and suppliers. The american subcontractors association is recognized as the united voice dedicated to improving the business environment in the construction industry and has over 5,500 member companies nationwide. Through a varied program, asa provides its members with opportunities to develop their business skills and keep in touch with the latest trends in construction. Asa advocates for subcontractors, working at both the federal and state levels, to make the changes necessary to protect subcontractor rights with regard to prompt pay, fair pro-contractor policies, harmful indemnity clauses, retention practices, egregious and abusive contract terms, osha rules and economic and tax rules, just to name a few. Asa offers a wealth of information and educational opportunities, including workshops, teleconferences, webinars, annual conferences and seminars. Asa of Arizona regularly hosts social events and other opportunities for asa members, their employees, and industry peers to get together and do important networking and build lasting working relationships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.4%; rating input score 98; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $102K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.