American Speckle Park Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871138703
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- St Joseph, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8166522220
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $47,373
- Expenses
- $38,668
- Assets
- $20,506
- Liabilities
- $1,251
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
- RON CARTY (DIRECTOR)
- BILL HEWAT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To develop, identify and register speckle park cattle; to keep records, including but not limited to, (i) to issue certificates of registration, (ii) to transfer ownership of speckle park cattle, (iii) to record membership in the corporation and the american speckle park association, (iv) to record numbers of speckle park cattle, and (v) to record payment of fees for certification; and to provide services for the promotion, development and marketing of speckle park cattle.
What it reported doing in 2023
Promote, develop, & register speckle park cattle.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.9%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 75.9%; rating input score 76
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.4%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 45.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 73.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 54.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.9% of revenue deployed · 75.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.