American Society of Pharmacognosy Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251581459
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Cedar Falls, IA, USA
- Phone
- 6164501762
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $243,243
- Expenses
- $86,447
- Assets
- $2,719,608
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- EMILY BRITTON (MEMBER AT LA)
- JOHN CARDELLINA (CHAIRPERSON)
- C BENJAMIN NAMAN (MEMBER AT LA)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As embodied in its by-laws, the american society of pharmacognosy found- ation is organized to promote, support and further the interests and purposes of the american society of pharmacognosy in the areas of charity, science & education, as defined and limited by section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986.
What it reported doing in 2024
Varro tyler prize for research on botanicals: an award to recognize an individual who has made outstanding scientific contributions to the board field of dietary supplements, with special emphasis on botanicals. 1. Paula brown, brithish columbia institute of tech, 5000 arthur e. Schwarting award: an award given for the best paper published in the journal of natual products. 1. Nadja cech, univ of North Carolina, 1000 jack l. Beal award: an award given for the best paper published in the journal of natual products by a young investigator. 1. Yudai matsuda, city univ of hong kong, 1000 matt suffness award: an award given to a new scientist for research in the natural products field. 1. Not awarded in 2024 john failkner award: an award given on a competitive basis to assist in the applicant's attendance at the annual meeting for presenting a lecture on the area of natural products. 1. Melissa henckel, Colorado univ, 1200 2. Chin-soon phan, latvian institute of organic synthesis, 1200 travel grants for active members: awarded on a competitive basis to active members in the first 5 years after earning their doctoral degree who require assistance to attend th society's annual meeting for presentation of research results. 1. Not awarded in 2024 lynn brady travel awards: an award given to graduate students to help defray the cost of travel to the annual asp meeting. 1. Swarnali chatterjee, univ of Alabama, 1200 2. Yukyung choi, sookmyung womans univ. 1200 3. Diana lomowska-keehner, univ of Florida, 1200 4. Emmanuel makinde, griffith univ, 1200 5. Belkes stambouli, city univ of New York, 1200 david carew student travel award: an award given on a competitive basis to assist in the applicant's attendence at the annual meeting for presenting a paper. 1. Ella vardeman, city univ of New York, 1200 wagar bhatti student travel award: an award given on a competitive basis to assist in the applicant's attendence at the annual meeting for presenting a paper. 1. Sahar amin, univ of Michigan, 1200 the jerry mclaughlin travel award: an award given on a competitive basis to assist in the applicant's attendence at the annual meeting for presenting a paper. 1. Timothy bushman, univ of Alabama, 1200 asp student research award: awarded on a competitive basis to a student to recognize that individual's outstanding research in the general area of natural products through a blinded review of the applicants research papers, by the society's awards and funds committee. 1. Not awarded in 2024 the kilmer prize: an award given on a competitive basis to assist in the applicant's attendence at the annual meeting for presenting a paper. 1. Not awarded in 2024 presidents travel award: awarded on a competitive basis to a graduate student to assist in the appliacant's attendance at the annual meeting for presentation of research results. 1. Not awarded in 2024 audrey s bingel fellowship for female scientists: the audrey s. Bingel fellowship is intended to provide funds, up to 25,000, to assist a female scientist in transitioning from a current career track to another, or to bolster the likelihood of success in her current, preferred career path. 1. Lidsay caesar, james madison univ. 3750 - 2023 award 2. Barbara adaikpoh, univ of chicago, 5000 david j slatkin symposium poster award: awarded on a competitive basis to students and postdocs. 1. Not awarded in 2024 minority undergraduate research fellowship: a 2.5 month summer research fellowship to support students in lab-based research under the supervision of an asp faculty mentor. Asp summer research will participate not only in lab research, but also in a series of weekly training and professional development workshops led by a team of asp faculty leaders. 1. Sabrina hernandez, univ of Florida, 5000 2. Gabriella mullet, case western reserve, 5000 3. Vivian rivera, western Kentucky univ, 5000 4. Christina rowe, univ of North Carolina, 5000 5. Paul speowl, morehouse college, 5000 asp student travel award: an award give
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 64.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 31.46; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $79K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.