American Society of Interior Designs Inc Pa West Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251633566
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
7244483900
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,517
Expenses
$48,681
Assets
$19,497

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TJ STAUFFER (PRESIDENT EL)
  • WENDI TROY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TJ STAUFFER (PRESIDENT EL)
  • WENDI TROY (PRESIDENT)
  • SAMANTHA STICKLE (DEVELOPMENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To deal with common issues and challenges of interior design. Its management, and related functions of the profession; to secure cooperative action in advancing its members' common purposes, foster equity in business usages, and promote activities designed to maximize the profession's potential and goals. To express its opinion on any question affecting the profession of the design, economic, environmental or cultural interest of the nation. To conduct and encourage education and research in interior design and otherwise advance the state of the art of interior design to maximum levels.

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide a positive environment for industry networking activities; knowledge generation, sharing and collective action; professional and student development as well as public education; and the expansion of interior design markets.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.