American Society of Interior Designers Wisconsin Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237417507
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Janesville, WI, USA
Phone
5869808057
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,245
Expenses
$89,775
Assets
$66,795

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Margaret Nedow (President)
  • Katie Barczak (President-Elect)

People named in this filing

  • Margaret Nedow (President)
  • Jessica Boyung (Communications)
  • Nancy Mooney Buske (Finance Dir.)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The American Society of Interior Designers is a community of people driven by acommon love for design and committed to the belief that interior design, as aservice to people, is a powerful, multi-faceted profession that can positivelychange people's lives. Through education, knowledge sharing, advocacy, communitybuilding and outreach, the association strives to advance the interior designprofession.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Wisconsin Chapter of the American Society of Interior Designers provided itsmembers with both continuing educational programs and professional networkingopportunities. Topics ranged from best business practices, strategies for seeking clients, technology resources, women's leadership, sustainability/green buildinginitiatives, and recognition of achievements in design. The Chapter also supportslocal student chapters with a mentor program and scholarships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13.3%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.