American Society of Digestive Disease
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473740986
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Phone
- 7349364478
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $158,227
- Expenses
- $94,754
- Assets
- $89,511
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BALJENDRA S KAPOOR MD FACR FSIR (PRESIDENT)
- CHARLES Y KIM MD FSIR (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RESMI CHARALEL MD MPH (COUNCILOR)
- KEVIN EL-HAYEK MD MBA FACS (COUNCILOR)
- ASHLEY FAULX MD MASGE FACG (COUNCILOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The american society of digestive disease interventions is a scientific organization dedicated towards advancement of clinical and scientific knowledge of various digestive diseases and related interventions such as gastrointestinal hemorrhage, primary and metastatic cancer of the liver, biliary system and pancreas and ischemia of intestine.
What it reported doing in 2025
Jointly sponsored the 9th annual meeting of digestive disease interventions (ddi), which is the first and only forum in the us devoted to the assembly of interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, oncologists, surgeons, and allied fields with a special interest in minimally invasive percutaneous therapies of the gi tract organs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.7%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.1%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.7% of revenue deployed · 92.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $88K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.