American Rottweiler Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237351416
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Johnstown, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9512971532
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Other Services - Specialty Animals
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,717
- Expenses
- $105,957
- Assets
- $224,612
- Liabilities
- $2,399
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT GALUSHA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT GALUSHA (PRESIDENT)
- KIMMY CARDONA (VICE-PRESIDE)
- ANN GLYNN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The american rottweiler club's primary purposes include 1)promotion of the public's knowledge and appreciation of dogs in general and rottweilers in specific; 2)education of rottweiler owners about proper care, health, breeding and training of their dogs; 3)holding speciality shows and working dog events under the rules of the american kennel club; and 4)support of rottweiler health and rottweiler rescue organizations and other dog related charities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rottweiler speciality shows and working dog events, education for rottweiler owners and rottweiler judges, support of rottweiler health and rottweiler rescue organizations and other dog related charities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.12; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $99K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.