American Revival Company Nfp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471817238
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3124297862
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $865
- Assets
- $149,911
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- MAREK LOZA (Director)
- JOHN L JANCZUR (Director)
- CHARLES K PAPP (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
American Revival Company NFP is a not-for-profit corporation dedicated to the development and improvement of urban communities. Although we undertake projects in all areas and involving all types of properties, we concentrate our efforts on rehabilitating dilapidated residential properties in neighborhoods that are deteriorating or at risk of it. We recognize that strong communities are built on strong families and strong families are, in turn, built within strong communities. We strive to generate this strength by providing minority and low income families with new and improved housing and struggling neighborhoods with economic growth. Our mission is to prevent, combat and reverse urban blight and community deterioration by building and supporting safe and economically viable houses and neighborhoods.We work with government agencies, private businesses and other not-for-profit organizations to facilitate transformation of neighborhoods in accordance with our mission street block by st
What it reported doing in 2024
We provide minority and low income families with new and improved housing and struggling neighborhoods with economic growth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 173.31; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -42.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -36.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.