American Podiatric Medical Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
530239502
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Rockville, MD, USA
Phone
3015819200
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,394,924
Expenses
$13,497,437
Assets
$21,251,531
Liabilities
$4,062,490

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICK DEHEER DPM (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • BROOKE BISBEE DPM (PRESIDENT)
  • SYLVIA VIRBULIS DPM (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • LAWRENCE SANTI DPM (IMMEDIATE PAST-PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES CHRISTINA DPM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CEO)
  • MEGHAN MCCLELLAND (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES CHRISTINA DPM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CEO): $405,988 total reported compensation
  • DENIS RUSSELL (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $393,324 total reported compensation
  • HEATHER STAGLIANO (COUNCIL ON PODIATRIC MEDIC): $255,126 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The association defends member podiatric physicians and surgeons' ability to practice to the full extent of their education and training to best serve public health.

What it reported doing in 2024

Clinical affairs provided podiatric population health resources and education related to "culinary coaching," "fall prevention, clinician, research and community connections," "glp-1 and glp/gip medications in diabetes management, and "treatment considerations of the pregnant and postpartum patient." developed research 101 video offerings for early career podiatrists to learn how to engage in research. Participated in development of peripheral artery disease quality and performance measures with american heart association and american college of cardiology supported podiatrists' participation in the 2024 and 2025 mips performance years.o offered one-on-one support to members with questions regarding mips eligibility, the hardship exception, and finding the best mips measures for them. Provided feedback to the draft podiatry mips value pathway candidate. Provided the resident essentials bundle of education to resident members. Awarded 62 apha student membership scholarships to current podiatric medical students for the 2025 year. Supported the work of the podiatric population health, research, and education committees. Supported writing competition for students and residents to encourage critical discussion surrounding the issues of financial literacy and physician well-being. Research projects to support the podiatric profession are ongoing and several were submitted for peer-reviewed publication. Worked on systematic review related to open versus closed approach to diabetic foot infections. Submitted a letter to the editor of foot and ankle international to support the podiatric profession from a published article attacking podiatry. Supported apma stewarded mips clinical quality measures #126 and #127. Represented podiatry as co-chair on cms's non-pressure ulcers episode-based cost measure clinician expert workgroup. Served as chair of the patient and community education committee with the american heart association's pad collaborative. Supported investigation of a foot exam-related hedis measure. Worked with air on expansion and harmonization of a diabetic foot-related quality measure. Built/maintained relationship with society for interventional radiology, society of vascular surgery, infectious disease society of america, and the alliance of gout awareness. Participated/represented, along with several apma volunteer leaders, with american heart association's peripheral artery disease national action plan collaborative. Advocated for inclusion of podiatrists in the eligibility requirements of the american institute of ultrasound in medicine. Published "concerning rates of laboratory-confirmed antifungal-resistant onychomycosis and tinea pedis: an online survey of podiatrists, united states" in health science reports and "evidence-based opioid education that reduces prescribing: the 10 principles of opioid prescribing in foot and ankle surgery" in the journal of foot and ankle surgery.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 77.6%; rating input score 78; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.57; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 11 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $406K · 21 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
  • Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 28 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.