American Pediatric Surgical Nurses Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223221908
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5618865427
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Surgery Specialties
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $197,393
- Expenses
- $77,533
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAQUEL PASARON (PRESIDENT)
- JANICE DUDLEY (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- CHRISTINE MCKENNA (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RAQUEL PASARON (PRESIDENT)
- JANICE DUDLEY (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- CHRISTINE MCKENNA (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of american pediatric surgical nurse association is to help further apsna members further their professional education, ethical and technically. The organization helps develop and foster a high standard of practice and care for the members of the organization through, education, publications, and annual conferences.
What it reported doing in 2016
The organization organizes an annual conference where members gather to discuss advances in theoretical and clinical knowledge impacting professionals in the industry and discuss the archives that were published through their network.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 24
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.9%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $78K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.