American Osteopathic Colleges of Opthalmology and Otolaryngology
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 511457551
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 8552626646
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,124,574
- Expenses
- $795,650
- Assets
- $9,316,036
- Liabilities
- $275,628
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LYNDSAY MADDEN DO (PRESIDENT)
- RALPH MCCLISH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT PEETS DO (TREASURER)
- LYNDSAY MADDEN DO (PRESIDENT)
- DOUGLAS KUBEK DO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The american osteopathic colleges of ophthalmology & otolaryngology head and neck surgery foundation supports resident training, education and research. The foundation strives to serve the healthcare needs of the public by seeking to develop effective grant-making in healthcare, health education and research.
What it reported doing in 2024
Students, residents, & fellows - the aocoo-hns foundation funds one ophthalmology "one-year" osteopathic student research fellowship, and one otolaryngology "one-year" osteopathic student research fellowship, in collaboration with research to prevent blindness, and the medical university of South Carolina.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.1%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 94.6%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.2%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.71; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.1% of revenue deployed · 94.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $753K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.