American Legion Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 720417281
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Crowley, LA, USA
- Phone
- 3372504047
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,273,679
- Expenses
- $1,294,193
- Assets
- $10,001,496
- Liabilities
- $4,864,498
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT LEE WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM NEVITT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TERRY OSBORNE (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- TERRY OSBORNE (CEO): $132,409 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of american legion hospital is to provide our community with access to a spectrum of high quality health services, while promoting health, wellness, education, and patriotism.
What it reported doing in 2024
American legion hospital ("alh") entered into a special services lease agreement with acadia general hospital, inc. ("agh") a Louisiana non-profit corporation, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of lafayette general health system, inc. ("lgh") a Louisiana non-profit corporation. Agh seamlessly continued the mission of alh by assuming the management and operations of alh's hospital on june 1, 2014. This made the hospital part of lgh's regional network of facilities.agh's role in this agreement is to provide high quality medical services using the expanded resources, technology, purchasing power, and clinical protocal lignment of lgh. The intent of this arrangementw as to provide financial stability and long-term viability of the hospital for the benefit of the residents of the city of crowley and acadia parish. This would enable better care to be delivered efficiently and cost-effectively, and it would ensure continued operation and access to hospital and emergency care.alh lease to agh the hospital buildings and fixtures. The lease included all the movable property, such as equipment, machinery, computers and software equipment. It also included all inventory, supplies, and pharmaceuticals. The initial term of the lease will be ten years with four opportunities to renew the lease for fice year periods. At the termination of the lease the movable property will revert to alh.as part of this lease agreement alh assisgned to agh its contracts, leases, permits, and licenses to that agh could operate the facility. Alh also assigned to agh its accounts receivable for services rendered in order to facilitate the collection of the bills, oagh also assumed the accounts payable for materials, services, and supplies. There is not issue with private inurement since agh is a nonprofit hospital continuing the same mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.9%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.73; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -32.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.9% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $132K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.