American Legion Auxiliary Unit of East Hampton Post No 419

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
112666553
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
East Hampton, NY, USA
Phone
6312678728
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,380
Expenses
$25,624
Assets
$40,196
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kelly Dilley (President)

People named in this filing

  • Kelly Dilley (President)
  • Cynthia Mack (1st Vice)
  • Kathy Samot (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and advocate for veterans, active military and their families. We award scholarships and promote quality education and literacy. The auxiliary support the American Legion and to honor the sacrifice of those who served by enhancing the live of our veterans, military, and their families, both at home and abroad.

What it reported doing in 2024

We provided gift cards, lap blankets, toiletries, & snacks to our homeless veterans. Our unit donated to veterans bingo. We also purchased gifts and host a Christmas dinner to our local veterans and seniors. We also donated to funds to purchase items needed for overseas military personnel.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.5%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 39.8%; rating input score 40

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.7%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.57; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.5% of revenue deployed · 39.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.