American Leadership Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 833672801
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Kingfisher, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4053756484
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Leadership Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $31,855
- Expenses
- $16,048
- Assets
- $25,739
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Corey Brooks (President)
People named in this filing
- Bart Looper (Secretary)
- Jared Harrison (Treasurer)
- Dr John Loose (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The American Leadership Foundation supports programs, events, procurements, entities, investments, and activities which promote leadership development, education, civic engagement, and/or the advancement of democracy, patriotism and American heritage in both youth and adults.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Foundation used $3,932 of its funding sponsoring young men to attend Oklahoma Boys State, a premier leadership and Americanism camp. The Foundation used $114 of its funding to purchase an award recognizing a "Distinguished Alumni" of the Oklahoma Boys State program, and $1,396 in medals for awards at the camp. In addition to that, the foundation purchased $4,005 ($801 in current depr.) in lighting and $519 in lighting components to be used this year and years to come at the program. The Foundation also spent $4,517 to provide multiple software programs to be used at camp and throughout the year, along with offering to provide other items of need to the program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 96.5%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 49.6%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 100.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 74.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 96.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.