American Knife and Tool Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
421472615
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Cody, WY, USA
Phone
3075878296
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$204,908
Expenses
$185,964
Assets
$89,654
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CJ BUCK (PRESIDENT)
  • MARK SCHREIBER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JAN BILLEB (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAN BILLEB (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $59,300 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The institute's purpose is to provide a forum for industry members to develop solutions to common problems and to promote knives as tools, educate individuals and law enforcement on knife issues, and monitor and promote reasonable and effective legislation and regulations.

What it reported doing in 2025

The american knife and tool institute (akti) represents all segments of the knife industry and all knife users and is recognized world wide as a respected, credible and accurate source for legislative input, legislation status and industry information pertaining to knives and edged tools. Akti provides a focal point for resources and volunteer energy in the sensible evolution, development, and the consistent enforcement of knife legislation. Akti is the go to source for educational content about the history and future of knives and edged tools. Akti has been the reasonable and responsible voice of the knifemaking and knifeusing community since 1998.to accomplish this mission akti's goals are to: 1) promote developed and maintained relationships to make changes to legislation in four different states and 1 federal initiative, promoting knives as valuable everyday tools. Supported the congressional sportsmen's foundation annual event (approximately 100 federal legislators and staff), the national assembly of sportsmen's caucus (approximately 200 state legislators and staff), held virtual meetings with legislators and key policy makers regarding the utility of knives and the importance of knives as tools, as well as common issues in knife laws that need to be addressed.2) educate maintain current and accurate information on the knife laws in all 50 states, d.c., and on the federal level. 3) inform assisted over 20 individuals with legal issues and/or referred to attorneys or experts for additional assistance. Answered numerous questions for individuals and companies regarding specific knife law questions in their city or state. Provided information on dealing with counterfeit knives, exporting knives and how to start a knife business. Communicated by email with members and supporters (over 30 times) on legislative or educational issues. Distributed over 500 brochures for first time knife users. Distributed over 1,000 cards about the responsibilities of a knife user. Published 12 articles explaining knife laws and issues.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $59K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.