American Jewish Committee
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 135563393
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2127514000
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Civil Rights
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $126,680,875
- Expenses
- $102,290,971
- Assets
- $334,912,804
- Liabilities
- $27,282,502
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
40 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL L TICHNOR (PRESIDENT)
- THEODORE DEUTCH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- THEODORE DEUTCH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $973,333 total reported compensation
- JULIE SCHAIR (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $482,265 total reported compensation
- JANET BECKER (CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES AND STRATEGY OFFICER): $391,633 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry, advocates for a secure Israel achieving fair treatment in the community of nations, and seeks to safeguard universal human rights. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AJC'S MISSION IS AVAILABLE ON AJC'S WEBSITE.
What it reported doing in 2024
Government and international affairs: american jewish committee (ajc) is the global advocacy organization for the jewish people. Through our 25 regional offices across the u.s., 15 overseas posts, and partnerships with 38 jewish community organizations worldwide, ajc works to create a world in which jews and israel thrive. We create trusted partnerships with global leaders, including elected officials, diplomats, religious leaders, community partners, corporations, media and social media outlets, among other sectors of civil society. Ajc's domestic and international advocacy efforts involve extensive outreach to, and interaction and joint programming with, u.s. And foreign government officials, political factions, policy experts, media outlets, and civil society partners, including overseas jewish communities. With the global jewish community still reeling from the horrors of hamas' brutal attack on october 7, 2023, ajc mobilized its unparalleled global network to tackle the unprecedented threats facing world jewry. From world capitals to college campuses, ajc worked with leaders across society to support israel and combat surging antisemitism, and we leverage strategic communications to educate, counter misinformation, and shape public opinion. Ajc released its annual state of antisemitism in america report, advocated for the implementation of the recommendations of its "call to action against antisemitism in america," which provides the necessary data to better understand, respond to, and prevent antisemitism. The agency also rallied the united states, european and middle east allies, and the international community to unite in action to decisively halt iran's quest for nuclear weapons, curtail its conventional weapons program, and check its regional aggression and internal oppression.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.5%; rating input score 97; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.3%; rating input score 96; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.27; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 26 of 27 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $82.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $973K · 40 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $19M reported
- Consistency: 50 of 52 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 34 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 21 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.