American Instructional Football League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462907093
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2014175729
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,356
- Expenses
- $25,683
- Assets
- $11,327
- Liabilities
- $45,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFREY BOUCHER (PRESIDENT)
- MATT LUCARELLO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEFFREY BOUCHER (PRESIDENT)
- MATT LUCARELLO (VICE PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM PARISI (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See shedule o
What it reported doing in 2020
To provide instructional based classes for children tolearn to play football, learn about sportsmanship, anddevelop a healthy lifestyle
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 49.1%; rating input score 49
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -249.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.97; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 49.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.