American Institute for Respiratory Equity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431484316
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3146452422
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Lung Disease

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,799,566
Expenses
$3,444,536
Assets
$1,450,408
Liabilities
$1,518,263

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICH CHRISMER (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRIS MARTINEZ (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRIS MARTINEZ (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $183,334 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The american institute for respiratory equity serves those affected by asthma and allergies through education, support and medical resources.

What it reported doing in 2024

First accomplishmentthe breath (bridging resources to encourage asthma treatment and health) program served a total of 169 clients in 8 counties in the saint louis region in 2024. 83% of kids in the program increased their score on the national asthma control test while on the program. 100% of children who were previously frequent hospital patients reported fewer emergency room visits in their first three weeks on the program. Upon diagnosis though our "diagnosis kits." diagnosis kits - over 1700 children were given backpacks full of medical and educational resources. Referred to as "new diagnosis kits". These are an attempt to expedite control. 3440 pieces of medical equopment were distributed. 18,200 pieces of educational materials were distributed, along with 8600 supportive materials.the rescue (resources for every school confronting unexpected emergencies) program provided asthma emergency equipment to 6,405 schools throughout both Missouri and Illinois and trained school nurses on how to use them. Through this partnership, 78% of the children who were treated with this equipment while at school were able to return to class instead of being sent home or to the emergency room, resulting in increased learning for children, savings for parents, and increased state reimbursements (ada) for schools. Aafa-stl also provided 20,900 metered doies albuterol inhalers, 174,222 pieces of equipment and education for 1396 school nurses staff and general public through various virtual and in-person events, most prominently with our trainings for the rescue program. 487 avoided ems and ed visits led to over $4.8mm in healthcare cost savings. Similarly, 2,461 de-escalated respiratory events led to savings of nearly $2.3mm to medicaid, 1.632 students supported directly and 5,571 mitigated absentee hours.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 82% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.8%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $29.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.8% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $183K · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $169K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.