American Indonesian Chamber of Commerce Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 135554848
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126874505
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $143,297
- Expenses
- $134,284
- Assets
- $99,428
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Wayne Forrest (President)
People named in this filing
- Cameron Hume (Chairman)
- Andrew Odell (Vice Chairman and Secretary)
- Wayne Forrest (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
AICC helps member companies examine the critical issues affecting a company's long and short term business strategy. We assist US companies do business in Indonesia as well as Indonesian companies in the United States. We host business meetings (seminars, conferences, and other sessions) to educate the public about trade and investment regulations, the Indonesian legal system, the impact of multilateral and bilateral trade agreements. We provide individualized counseling, translations, research, and networking services. We advise governments on policies that promote a fair trading system and the rule of law.
What it reported doing in 2025
AICC provided investment and trade advice to over 200 companies in 2025 as well as many Zoom chats with American entrepreneurs looking to do business in Indonesia
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.3%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 44.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.