American Immigration Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521549711
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025077636
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,940,088
- Expenses
- $12,429,698
- Assets
- $13,669,866
- Liabilities
- $1,797,571
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEREMY ROBBINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JEREMY ROBBINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $337,859 total reported compensation
- JORGE LOWEREE (MANAGING DIRECTOR, STRATEGY AND PROGRAMS): $241,585 total reported compensation
- KATHERINE STEINBERG (DIRECTOR, CONSUMER CONTENT AND BRAND STRATEGY): $202,425 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The council strives to strengthen the united states by shaping immigration policies and practices through innovative programs, cutting-edge research, and strategic legal and advocacy efforts grounded in evidence, compassion, justice and fairness.
What it reported doing in 2024
Building a more welcoming country from the ground upstate and local our state and local team engages business leaders, coalitions, nonprofit organizations, and policymakers nationwide to build a welcoming environment for newcomers in states and local communities. To support advocates, the team tracks immigrant related legislation in all 50 states and provides timely updates, data, research reports, technical assistance, talking points, testimony, and letters of support. In 2024, we have tracked more than 800 immigrant-related bills and provided weekly updates via external trackers to partners and stakeholders.in 2024, we supported the 17 pro-immigrant bills related to the created of offices of new americans, language access, occupational licensure, and funding to support migrant integration. We released reports on the growing demand for healthcare workers in New York, Michigan, and Massachusetts. To help push back against state policies that harm immigrants and communities overall, we partnered with refugee advocacy lab and the international rescue committee to publish a toolkit on countering anti0immigrant policies. In 2024, we organized the global talent chamber network convening, bringing together 20 chamber of commerce leaders from 17 chambers across the us. Business leaders learned from experts and from one another about how the business community can collaborate more closely with its immigrant and refugee neighbors to ensure a more equitable future where everyone can thrive and contribute to the economy. During the convening, we gathered support for a business letter urging the biden administration to address work permit backlogs by prioritizing the processing of initial and renewal permit applications. Over 100 signatories, representing national, state, and local businesses across 25 states, signed the letter. As a result of this advocacy, the department of homeland security announced a final regulation in december to extend work permits for 540 days.the office of new americans state network continues to grow, reaching 22 members with the addition of Pennsylvania, New Mexico, and Hawaii. These 22 states represent two-thirds of the total immigrant population in 2022. As states began encountering increasing migrant arrivals from the southern border, we traveled with a group of 15 ona staff from 10 states on a site visit to san diego to better understand federal, state, and non-governmental organization operations in the city and at the border. We held our annual ona convening in Washington, d.c. Celebrating the 10th anniversary of the network. Nearly 40 representatives from 18 ona states received a post-election briefing from the council's policy team and exit poll analysis of voter sentiments on immigration from the immigration hub.our gateways for growth program had four communities in our 5th cohort. These communities included south bend, Indiana; fort wayne, Indiana; baltimore county, Maryland; and santa fe, New Mexico. These communities pushed forward immigrant inclusion initiatives, relying on the council's data to showcase the demographic and economic contributions of newcomers. The council also brought together 23 past participants to solicit feedback on the gateways for growth experience and how it can be improved.center for inclusion and belonging our center for inclusion and belonging program uses narrative and culture change strategies to counter biases, prejudices, and "othering" while advancing the inclusion and belonging of everyone in the united states. Belonging begins with us (bbwu) uses high profile partnerships to extend its message to new audiences in the places and spaces where they live, work, and play. Since the launch of bbwu in 2020, it has garnered over $95 million in donated media, and its content reach millions of viewers.the council has partnered with the team up project to release a new "shared table" public service announcement encouraging people to come together across lines of difference
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 73.3%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.1%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 73.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $338K · 30 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $726K reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.