American Hospital of Paris
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 980000061
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
- Phone
- 3346412507
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $183,048,533
- Expenses
- $164,996,762
- Assets
- $248,511,894
- Liabilities
- $90,309,401
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
53 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT SIGAL (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT SIGAL (CEO): $696,476 total reported compensation
- JEAN LOUIS SOTTON (DIR DES RH): $335,145 total reported compensation
- PASCAL BEHIER (CFO): $261,650 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bring together in paris the best french and american medicine; to provide high quality and personalized health care to members of the french, american and international communities residing in france and abroad; to respect ethical practices as well as the cultural diversity of our patients.
What it reported doing in 2023
The american hospital of paris provides high quality care to french and international patients using advanced medical technologies utilized by highly qualified medical staff. The areas of activity are diverse and consist of medically assisted procreation, medical imaging, functional explorations, physical therapy, prenatal diagnosis, maternity, general surgery, and outpatient consultations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 51
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.2%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 64.7%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.9%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.2% of revenue deployed · 64.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 38 of 38 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $106.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $696K · 53 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $20.6M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.