American Gem Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951409272
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7025606629
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,757,617
- Expenses
- $5,374,925
- Assets
- $25,863,345
- Liabilities
- $949,631
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHERINE BODOH (CEO)
- ALEXIS PADIS (PRESIDENT)
- BRYAN MOELLER (PRESIDENT-EL)
- LISA BRIDGE (PRESIDENT TH)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHERINE BODOH (CEO): $341,571 total reported compensation
- JANICE BROOKS (CFO): $287,824 total reported compensation
- DONNA JOLLY (MARKETING DI): $141,249 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated to consumer protection, ethical business standards, and the development of the highest gemological skill, knowledge, and grading standards of its membership and customers.
What it reported doing in 2023
Ags develops educational content for our membership, which they can use to educate consumers in their respective communities, resulting in enhanced knowledge and appreciation for their purchase and a deeper understanding of the jewelry industry. Approximately 700 members attend the annual educational conference, and 2,000 complete educational courses and programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.81; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $342K · 26 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $657K reported
- Consistency: 15 of 17 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.