American Friends of the Paris Opera and Ballet Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133219847
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2124391426
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,394,445
- Expenses
- $2,069,743
- Assets
- $2,842,018
- Liabilities
- $33,577
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEANNE REZAI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JEANNE REZAI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $115,050 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To solicit funds to support the paris opera and promote french-american artistic exchange. (see schedule o).inaddition to underwriting touring and productions that prominently feature the work of american artists, afpob helps nurture the next generation of dancers, singers and audience members through student exchanges, scholarships and educational programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our primary mission is to share the many treasures of the paris opra directly with the american audiences and foster cultural and artistic exchanges between the united states and france. Since its inception, afpob has facilitated numerous tours by the paris opera, the opera ballet, and the acadmie as well as arranged u.s. Appearances by artists affiliated with the paris opera. Concurrently, afpob has brought many works to paris, showcasing american artists such as jerome robbins, trisha brown, william christie, peter sellars, and robert wilson. Additionally, afpob regularly organizes trips to paris for its patrons, providing them with an opportunity to immerse themselves in france's cultural richness, along with traveling exhibitions, soires, and galas.one of our core objectives is to build cultural bridges between the paris opera, american audiences, and artists. Today, afpob embodies the significance of promoting franco-american friendship and cultural exchange between these two countries through the arts. We achieve this through a vibrant and dynamic program of artistic and educational exchanges, patrons' trips, and special events throughout the year.we offer individuals the opportunity to become more involved in the diverse projects and programs of the paris opera, including scholarships and exchange programs. Additionally, supporters can underwrite opera or choreography productions, contribute to renovations, and participate in major paris opera events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 93% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.3%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $98.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 50%; rating input score 50; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.3% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.