American Friends of Neve Hanna Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133601919
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oakland Gardens, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3478368118
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $206,604
- Expenses
- $241,590
- Assets
- $103,116
- Liabilities
- $2,624
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
41 people listed
People named in this filing
- JANET TOBIN (CO-PRES)
- IRWIN TOBIN (CO-PRES)
- MARGE MILLER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The maintenance of a facility for children from troubled homes in israel. These children are usually placed in neve hanna as a result of court orders or
What it reported doing in 2024
Part i line 3-neve hanna is located in kiryat gat israel. It is a facility for children who have been removed from their parents homes by court order. These children come from homes where the parents can be abusers, drug users or any other way deemed to be unfit. Neve hanna provides a campus dormitory style setting where the children go to school with the other children from the town of kiryat gat. Our organizations provides money for computers, athletic facilities, life cycle events of the children and the general upkeep of the entire facility.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 54
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.9%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.9% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 39 of 39 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $206K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 41 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.