American Friends Darchei Israel Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832721447
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Baltimore, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4105855981
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $519,467
- Expenses
- $273,459
- Assets
- $419,070
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHIMON ROOSHAN SHAD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHIMON ROOSHAN SHAD (PRESIDENT)
- YOSEF ASHURZADEH (SECRETARY)
- NINA MOINZADEH (OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
American friends darchei israel works on bringing jews a deeper understanding of religion and donating money to local communities in need.
What it reported doing in 2025
American friends supports the activities of darchei israel, which is located in israel. American friends darchei israel has helped thousands of people learn more about religion and continue their education. Part of darchei israel's activities is providing a monthly stipend in the forms of scholarships for the jewish adult men who are learning in the full-time institute for advanced talmudic studies. It also donates charity to low- income families and to those who require assistance in their temporary hardships. The donations include food, clothing and other important necessities to meet their living expenses. Another realm of the organizations work is assisting poor newlywed begin their new life by donating housewares.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 98.7%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.53; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53% of revenue deployed · 98.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $270K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.