American Federation of Teachers 2378 New Bedford Federation of Paraprofession

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
046315885
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
New Bedford, MA, USA
Phone
5082073230
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$93,484
Expenses
$97,614
Assets
$97,624
Liabilities
$24,786

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JILLIAN ZANGAO (PRESIDENT)
  • LAWRENCE GENEREUX (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JILLIAN ZANGAO (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHELLE WILLIS (TREASURER)
  • TARA STEVENS (RECORDING SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

New bedford federation of paraprofessionals is organized for the purpose of representing employees of the new bedford school system in dealing with employers regarding labor management issues, including, but not limited to, negotiating and administering the collective bargaining contract and settling grievances and disputes.

What it reported doing in 2023

New bedford federation of paraprofessionals is organized for the purpose of representing employees of the new bedford school system in dealing employers regarding labor management issues, including, but not limited to, negotiating and administering the collective bargaining contract and settling grievances and disputes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $96K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.